Australopithecus Vs. Paranthropus

Scientists have had much difficulty interpreting the phylogenetic relationships of the downcast Skull because it is comprised of both primitive features and derived ones. It has a very small brainiac volume, a erect-scale sagittal crest, and the upper face projects consid whilebly. every(prenominal) of these traits place it in the early Australopithecus af atomic number 18nsis grouping. However, the Black Skull at any rate features derived traits associated with later robust hominids. This includes such traits as a openhanded face, a large palate, and a large ara for the hold dentition. Thus, a clear understanding of where this skull belongs becomes troublesome and a parvenu species, Paranthropus aethiopicus, has been created for the skull.         Australopithecines can be specify as hominids from the Plio-Pleistocene period in Africa characterized by bipedal locomotion and a comparatively small brain. Paranthropucines are similar to Australop ithecines except they are defined as more robust, that is they have much larger odontiasis and larger jaws meant to process tough foods.

The Mystery Specimen from beam 5 resembles both Australopithecus afarensis and Paranthropus boisei, but because it has a sagittal crest, it must be a Paranthropus. Its primitive features are slight prognathism and a relatively small neurocranium. Its derived features include large molars, a wide flat face, and a sagittal crest. If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our se rvice, visit our page: write my essay