Final Exam Questions

Question 1 . In the shift of Pell vs . Procunier the media and inmates of a atomic number 20 prison brought a civil rights display case a drawst the corrections plane section alleging that they had certain rights that had been disclose mainly being the First and ordinal Amendments . The judgeship at first found that the atomic number 20 voice of Corrections manual prohibiting media interview with certain inmates was wrong and immovable that the inmates First Amendment independence of speech rights must be considered The coquet looked at the concomitant that inmates had entrance to anyone with writing and were allowed visitor with friend , family , attorneys and clergy that could contact the media . With them having entranceway , the judge concluded that the calcium Department of Corrections Manual did non inf ringe on the inmates exemption of speech . Because it did non stop media memory devil to gain tuition ready(prenominal) to members of the general human race and in fact the media had more access to prisons than the general humankind , so this did not stop the media s granting immunity of the press . In the final result the court turn the summary judgment for the inmates against the corrections section on the allegement that a corrections statute violated the inmate s granting immunity of speech . The court affirmed the spillage of the media s claim that the regulation violated the media s freedom of the press . It was dogged that the First amendment does not guarantee the press a constitutional right of finical access to info that is not available to the general publicWith the case Houchins v . KQED the petitioner , the sheriff , d an supplicant that would stop word personnel access to jails , still the unify States Court of Appeals for the ninth Circuit stopped the injunction and verbalize that t! he public and the media had twain the first and the fourteenth Amendment right of access to prisons and jails . The sheriff d an prayer . The watchword personnel wanted access stating the right of public access to prisons and jails was necessary to stop officials from privateness prison conditions from the voters and impairing the public s right to discuss and criticize the prisons remains . The courts found that the guaranteed freedom of speech did not create special privilege to news personnel . In the end the courts rule that the sheriff could deny media access to the jails facilities . The first or the fourteenth Amendments does not give a right of access to government information or sources of information within the governments control (http /lexisnexis .comQuestion 2 . The paper underlying the penitential was drawn from religious perspectives . It thus seems ironic that there would be any conflicts in providing freedom of holiness in prisons , but this has in deed been the case . The early efforts to restitute the criminal through penitence and prayer were conducted in weensy homogeneous communities As immigration to America expanded , it became the close heterogeneous people in the world . Because the United States was founded on a dogma that freedom of worship could not be infringed...If you want to arrive a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay